Chronic Refractory Angina


Temporary Sympathectomy


The generation of the sensation of angina pectoris must involve the activation of an afferent nerve pathway. It is naive to consider the sympathetic system as wholly efferent, when it is clear that the other principal autonomic nerve trunk supplying the heart, namely the vagus nerve, is known to conduct both afferent and efferent signals. Therefore, it is likely that the neural messages that are interpreted by the brain as angina pectoris reach the central nervous system at least in part by travelling along sympathetic afferent nerves.

In the 1930's it was recognised by neurosurgeons performing destructive sympathectomies for angina pectoris that local anaesthetic infiltration around the stellate ganglion often resulted in pain relief outlasting the duration of action of the local anaesthetic drug13. This observation has been more recently confirmed14, and is currently (June 1999) the subject of a large scale randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial funded by the British Heart Foundation.

The pathogenesis of angina and myocardial infarction pain involves the activation of the afferent sympathetic pathway. A frequent and important consequence of pain (especially when severe) is the `flight or fight' response through activation of sympathetic efferents. The clinical image of the patient with an acute myocardial infarction (cold, clammy, sweaty, anxious, tachycardic) is secondary to this adrenergic activation. Therefore, angina might be regarded as the sensory component of a positive feedback loop, which cannot under these circumstances be conceived as resulting in benefit, and which may be considered to be a maladaption.

The angina-relieving effects of sympathetic blockade might be due to interference with this maladaptive feedback loop, in a similar manner to the way in which adenosine interrupts a re-entrant tachycardia. If such a loop exists, it may partly explain chronic refractory angina and the fact that temporary interruption of this pathway has a prolonged effect on pain14. Beneficial amelioration of angina can be achieved with repeated blocks14. There does not appear to be any predictability in the length of time a patient remains pain-free after successive blocks.

Stellate ganglion blockade, Paravertebral blockade, Epidurals.

 

References
  1. World Health Organisation. Needs and action priorities in cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention in patients with coronary heart disease. Geneva: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 1993

  2. NHS Centre for Review and Dissemination, University of New York. Cardiac Rehabilitation. Effective Health Care Bulletin 1988; 4: 1-2

  3. Thompson DR, Bowman GS, Kitson AL, De Bono D, Hopkins A. Cardiac Rehabilitation in the UK: Guidelines and audit standards. Heart 1996; 75: 89-93

  4. Wynn A. Unwarranted emotional distress in men with ischaemic heart disease. Med J Aust, 1967; 2: 847-851

  5. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica; 67: 361-70

  6. Mannheimer C, Carlsson C-A, Vedin A, Wilhelmsson. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in angina pectoris. Pain 1986;26:291-300.

  7. Borjesson M, Eriksson P, Dellborg M, Eliasson T, Mannheimer C. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in unstable angina pectoris. Coronary Artery Disease 1997;8:843-50.

  8. Mannheimer C, Carlsson C-A, Emanuelsson H, Vedin A, Waagstein F, Wilhelmsson C. The effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with severe angina pectoris. Circulation 1985;71:308-16.

  9. Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science 1965;150:971-9.

  10. Carroll D, Tramer M, McQuay H, Nye B, Moore A. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in labour pain: a systematic review. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1997;104:169-75

  11. Bourke DL, Smith BA, Erickson J, Gwartz B, Lessard L. TENS reduces halothane requirements during hand surgery. Anesthesiology 1984; 61:769-72

  12. Chen D, Philip M, Philip PA, Monga TN. Cardiac pacemaker inhibition by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1990;71:27-30.

  13. Gask GE. The surgery of the sympathetic nervous system. British Journal of Surgery 1933;21:113-30.

  14. Hammond C, Leach AA, Chester MR. Temporary sympathectomy in refractory angina. Heart 1999; 81(suppl):56.

  15. Shealy CN, Mortimer JT, Reswick JB. Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: preliminary clinical report. Anesth Analg 1967;46:489-91.

  16. Murphy DF, Giles KE. Dorsal column stimulation for pain relief from intractable angina pectoris. Pain 1987;28:365-8.

  17. Mannheimer C, Eliasson T, Augustinsson L-E, Blomstrand C, Emanuelsson H, Larsson S, Norrsell H, Hjalmarsson â. Electrical stimulation versus coronary artery bypass surgery in severe angina pectoris. The ESBY study. Circulation 1998;97:1157-63

  18. Anderson C, Hole P, OxhØj H. Does pain relief with spinal cord stimulation for angina conceal myocardial infarction? Br Heart J 1994;71:419-421.

  19. Sanderson JE, Ibrahim B, Waterhouse D, Palmer RBG. Spinal electrical stimulation for intractable angina — long term clinical outcome and safety. Eur Heart J 1994;15:810-14.

  20. Hautvast RW, Ter Horst GJ, DeJong BM, DeJongste MJL, Blanksma PK, Paans AMJ, Korf J. Relative changes in regional cerebral blood flow during spinal cord stimulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris. European Journal of Neuroscience 1997;9:1178-83.

  21. White PD, Angina Pectoris. Heart Disease New York, Macmillan 1931. pp 621-3

  22. Mirhoseini M, Cayton MM. Revascularisation of the heart by laser. J Microvasc Surg 1981;2:253-60.

  23. Kohmoto T, Argenziano M. Assessment of transmyocardial perfusion in alligator hearts. Circulation 1997;95:1585-91.

  24. Horvath KA, Cohn LH, Cooley DA, Crew JR, Frazier GH, Griffith BP, Kadipasaoglu K, Lansing A, Mannting F, March R, Mirhoseini MR, Smith C. Transmyocardial laser revascularisation: results of a multi-centre transmyocardial laser revascularisation used as sole therapy for end-stage coronary artery disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;113:645-54.

  25. Blomberg SG. Long-term home self-treatment with high thoracic epidural analgesia in patients with severe coronary artery disease. Anesth Analg 1994;79:413-21

  26. Schofield PM, Sharples LD, Caine N, Burns S, Tait S, Wistow T, Buxton M, Wallwork J. Transmyocardial laser revascularisation in patients with refractory angina: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1999;353:519-524.

All pages copyright © angina.org. Last Revision: August 15 2002